|
Otto-da-Fé Castro and Dodd wage an inquisition against a Bush nominee BY MARY ANASTASIA O'GRADY On March
30, Cuban National Assembly President Ricardo Alarcon denounced the Bush
administration's intention to nominate Otto Reich as assistant secretary
of state for the Western Hemisphere, calling it an attempt "to
impose a kind of Third Reich in Latin America." In fact, Mr.
Reich's paternal grandparents were Austrian Jews who died in the
Holocaust. Mr.
Alarcon's foot-in-mouth gaffe inadvertently underscored the double
whammy that 20th-century jackboots served up to tens of thousands of
Europe's Jews. Many European Jews fled Hitler's genocide for Russia,
only to be trapped in Soviet persecution for decades. Mr. Reich's father
emigrated to the West but unluckily landed in Cuba. He escaped from the
island with his young family in 1960. Mr.
Alarcon also called Mr. Reich "a member of Miami's anti-Cuban
Mafia" and "a notorious character throughout the Iran-contra
operation." Translation: The Castro regime, which has struggled for
decades to impose its own brand of repression on Latin America, still
smarts from its defeat in Nicaragua. Fidel blames the likes of Mr. Reich
because from 1983 to 1986 Mr. Reich ran the State Department's Office of
Public Diplomacy, which was designed to battle communist disinformation
and misinformation campaigns.
With an
endorsement like that from Cuba, Mr. Reich should be a shoo-in for
Senate confirmation. But the trouble is that Fidel Castro isn't the only
sore loser. Ever since Mr. Bush proposed Mr. Reich for the post,
Washington has been buzzing about all the Senate Democrats--and one
influential staffer--who still harbor bitter resentment about the defeat
of their beloved Sandinista revolution. This, even though the defeat was
less due to Reagan anticommunism than to the discovery by Nicaraguans
that they had been made victim of a Cuban coup. "It's payback
time," says one close observer of Washington's policy war over
Central America in the 1980s. According to Jay Nordlinger, writing in
the latest National Review, "A group of [Democrats] on the Hill is
meeting regularly to plot Reich's defeat." Having
also served as the U.S. ambassador to Venezuela from 1986 through 1989,
Mr. Reich is a highly qualified candidate whose expertise on Latin
America is urgently needed at the State Department. U.S. leadership in
the region was nearly nonexistent during the Clinton years. Today
economic malaise, guerrilla insurgencies and drug trafficking all
seriously threaten to undermine fragile stability. When
assessing Mr. Reich's chances, New England's left-leaning senatorial
duo, John Kerry (D., Mass.) and Christopher Dodd (D., Conn.),
loom large. Mr. Dodd is now chairman of the Subcommittee on Western
Hemispheric Affairs and has always fancied himself a Latin American
expert. He vociferously opposed Reagan policy in Central America. It is a
matter of record that Mr. Dodd, who comes from America's richest--and
arguably most capitalist--state was remarkably sanguine about Sandinismo
in Nicaragua, despite the well-known fact that a Castro-trained
Sandinista junta had seized control of the government and was supporting
an insurgency in neighboring El Salvador. In an Aug. 21, 1983,
"Meet the Press" interview, Mr. Dodd refused to acknowledge
that the Nicaraguan revolutionaries were Marxists or that Marxism was
dangerous. "We shouldn't [assume] that [if] someone happens to be a
Marxist, that immediately they're going to be antagonistic to our
interests or going to threaten our security," he said. Asked about
the Sandinista goal of "promoting revolution without
frontiers" in Central America, Mr. Dodd said, "I don't
necessarily believe because they use that kind of rhetoric that they're
determined to overthrow every neighboring government in the Central
American region." Soviet and Chilean documents released since then
prove he was dead wrong about the Marxist threat to the region. Managuan
newspaper editor Pedro Joaquín Chamorro Barrios told a Journal writer
in 1980 about a visit he received from the Soviet ambassador soon after
the junta takeover. The ambassador's message: "We're in charge here
now."
According
to people familiar with the situation, longtime Dodd staffer Janice
O'Connell, who also slugged it out with Reaganites over Central America,
has a key role in the "get Reich" effort. Asked about this,
she wanted to know if she was off the record. When the reply was
"no," she said: "I have no comment. I simply prepare the
report and the members vote." Ms.
O'Connell's views are well known. On the TransAfrica Forum Web site,
TransAfrica President Randall Robinson introduces Ms. O'Connell at a
roundtable, noting her "opposition to Contra aid and military
assistance to El Salvador" and support for "restoration of
civilian rule in Haiti," which means she backed U.S. military
intervention to return avowed Marxist Jean Bertrand Aristide to power. Surely
Mr. Reich reminds Mr. Dodd and his first lieutenant of Ronald Reagan's
many triumphs. A special bonus to a Reich defeat would be the slap in
the face of the Cuban-American exile community and, yes, even payback
for the fact that Sandinista leader Daniel Ortega ultimately was forced
to call an election in Nicaragua and lost. But the real problem for the
Doddites is that a Reich posting would ensure that any future Democratic
efforts on behalf of Latin America's armed left would face a barrier at
the State Department. Mr. Dodd and his little group of powerful senators
most likely hope that by knocking off Mr. Reich, they'll force Mr. Bush
to put up a more pliable career bureaucrat.
Mr.
Reich's supporters are confident that, given a hearing, he can be
confirmed. But last week, Mr. Dodd postponed the hearing for another of
his targets, President Bush's candidate for U.S. ambassador to the
United Nations, former U.S. Ambassador to Honduras John Negroponte. He
can use the same tactic, for months on end, to deny Mr. Reich the chance
to refute a barrage of false allegations. The Bush
administration is signaling staunch resolve to stand by its men.
Insiders are betting that Mr. Negroponte, who has strong bipartisan
support, will eventually get through, but the Dodd commitment to a Reich
defeat may be a problem. If Mr.
Dodd wants to kill the nomination, Mr. Bush should make him do it
outright, rather than allowing it to die as a result of perpetual
hearing delays. Dropping the candidate would reek of Clintonianism, to
say nothing of the abandonment of a public servant who remained loyal to
American values despite the rigors of the Cold War. Copyright
© 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. |